<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[appguard pc protection Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/appguard+pc+protection.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to appguard pc protection]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft: Exploits likely for 'critical' Windows vulnerabilities]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=67799&messageID=1289128&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares if exploit code will be released in the futureAs long as it is patched before the exploits are out, the exploits no longer count. Or something like that.Cue the double standards...PS I wonder which one of these was labeled "Bulletin 3" in the pre-patch announcement? According to some...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:09:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patches.html"><![CDATA[Patches]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/exploit.html"><![CDATA[exploit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patch.html"><![CDATA[patch]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lua.html"><![CDATA[LUA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
