<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[analysis and vonage Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/analysis+and+vonage.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to analysis and vonage]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Complete Verizon-Vonage Patent analysis Part Three: 6,359,880]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1519]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for us to kick around the third in the three disputed Verizon Patents at the heart of the infringement claims against Vonage.Thats be Verizon Patent 6,359,880 - Public wireless/cordless internet gateway.Abstract:A localized wireless gateway system provides wireless telephone  communication, and for at least interexchange communication, provides voice ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:59:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Complete Verizon-Vonage Patent analysis Part Two: 6,104,711]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1518]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ Now we will check out Verizons patent 6,104,711 - Enhanced internet domain name server.To me this is the most overgeneralized of all Verizons claims. As a matter of fact, this is a patent granted to Verizons predecessor Bell Atlantic back in 1997. The Patent Abstract describes:An enhanced name translation...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:58:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Complete Verizon-Vonage patent analysis Part One: 6,282,574]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1517]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[My interpretation: I agree with Om that the technology described here is so generic that a claim for infringement is highly unlikely. Entitled  Method, server and telecommunications system for name translation on a conditional basis and/or to a telephone number, Verizons U.S. Patent 6,282,574 refers to:An enhanced name translation...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:57:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/regulatory.html"><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
