<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[amd dual-core Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+dual-core.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to amd dual-core]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[AMD dual-core "Kuma" Phenom X2 spec in the wild]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=51392&messageID=965169&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD dual-core "Kuma" Phenom X2 spec in the wildI really want to see AMD compete but...I have this feeling that by the time they get a 65nm processor to market Intel will make another leap ahead and AMD will go back to being the economy choice.  I really hope...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:42:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+dual-core.html"><![CDATA[AMD Dual-Core]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dual-core.html"><![CDATA[dual-core]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The effect of bloatware: A 1986 Mac Plus beats a 2007 AMD dual-core PC]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34470&messageID=634455&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The effect of bloatware: A 1986 Mac Plus beats a 2007 AMD dual-core PCIf he had compared to OS X TigerThe old machine would have smoked it worse. Not to mention the overbloated LeopardVista wannabe.I did.Not overly impressed.Maybe the next iteration will be better.JJBHAHAHAHA!!!!What a useless test! It does go...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lucino.html"><![CDATA[Lucino]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+macintosh.html"><![CDATA[Apple Macintosh]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+dual-core.html"><![CDATA[AMD Dual-Core]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bloatware.html"><![CDATA[bloatware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
