<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[ambivalence Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ambivalence.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to ambivalence]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Samba 3.2 reflects open source project's ambivalence toward Microsoft]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=47438&messageID=883246&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Samba 3.2 reflects open source project's ambivalence toward MicrosoftSamba 3.2 reflects open source project's ambivalence toward MicrosoftLets see if there is a way to get rid of Samba completely.  Perhaps Microsoft could make a protocol to work on all machines and thus eliminate the need for Samba."Leading a panel"Indeed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/samba.html"><![CDATA[Samba]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/jeremy.html"><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/samba+3.2.html"><![CDATA[Samba 3.2]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ambivalence.html"><![CDATA[ambivalence]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+project.html"><![CDATA[open source project]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
