<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[alpha chip Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alpha+chip.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to alpha chip]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[>Waiting for Steve's other shoe]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=12271&messageID=245316&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[>Waiting for Steve's other shoeIn Steve's defenseHe NEVER SAID that Apple would use an x86 processor - only an InHell one. This leaves SOME wiggle room to backing away from x86, but the timing is critical - as developers are starting to want new Macs to develop on.Using a "straight"...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 05:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alpha+chip.html"><![CDATA[Alpha chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+sparc.html"><![CDATA[Sun Sparc]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/inhell.html"><![CDATA[Inhell]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alpha.html"><![CDATA[Alpha]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
