<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[alecco Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alecco.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to alecco]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[|)ruid and HD Moore release part 2 of DNS exploit]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50065&messageID=938430&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[|)ruid and HD Moore release part 2 of DNS exploitSo, Linux's BIND the first to be exploited...So, Linux's BIND the first to be exploited...Nice work!CoolNate, nice post and analysis!Wasn't the replacing the ns.victim.com cache entry part of the Halvar Flake speculation? I thought first part of the exploit was to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domain+names.html"><![CDATA[Domain names]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[NETWORKING]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alecco.html"><![CDATA[Alecco]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dns.html"><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ruid.html"><![CDATA[ruid]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/exploit.html"><![CDATA[exploit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hd+moore.html"><![CDATA[HD Moore]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
