<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[64-bit cpu Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to 64-bit cpu]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="9" found="9" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Via makes way for 64-bit chips]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=43504&messageID=804616&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Via makes way for 64-bit chipsbeen running 64 bitsUbuntu since Feisty here. No problems at all. Works like a charm!Via playing catch up, eh?Both Intel's and AMD's entire lineup of chips are all already 64 bit. AMD led the way with the Athlon 64, and Intel's Core 2 architecture is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel's long-awaited Montecito set for debut]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=22900&messageID=433785&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel's long-awaited Montecito set for debutYawn.Well, it looks like Don can finally plan to buy a high-end machine to run his custom version of Solitaire ...Which will be about the only software that runs on it -- all of the major software vendors have dropped the Itanic from their roadmaps.And...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:04:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/now+let.html"><![CDATA[Now Let]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/multi-core.html"><![CDATA[multi-core]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+company.html"><![CDATA[software company]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/montecito.html"><![CDATA[Montecito]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,IBM,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft makes its way to 64-bit chips]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15193&messageID=302787&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft makes its way to 64-bit chipsmore hot air from M$!Billy is just a me too dude claiming to be the inventor.Linux has been diong 64 bits for many years.hahahahahahahahhahahaheeeehehehehahahahahaGimme a break!C'mon trolls, speak up!No W64 on Niagara?I'm probably going to get pilloried for this, but am I the only...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/washington+state.html"><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel unveils new class of Pentium 4s]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=8374&messageID=168711&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel unveils new class of Pentium 4smaybe these new oneswon't use 105 watts at full tilt and still be outperformed by AMD's top offering which uses ]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel programming tools reach new 64-bit chips]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=5693&messageID=116999&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel programming tools reach new 64-bit chips'bout Time!Where y'at, Intel, we've missed you!]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/productivity.html"><![CDATA[PRODUCTIVITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/development+tools.html"><![CDATA[Development tools]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/programming+tool.html"><![CDATA[programming tool]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tool.html"><![CDATA[tool]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[First game for AMD 64-bit chip emerges]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=5472&messageID=112747&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[First game for AMD 64-bit chip emerges512 KBSounds like the early 80's.  Nothing important to say.  Just trolling.  :PWhat the...Why on earth create a game for a platform that doesn't exist yet?  Why didn't they write this for 64-bit Linux or OS X?  After all,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/games.html"><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/game.html"><![CDATA[game]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel eyes 64-bit chips for desktops]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1479&messageID=29132&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel eyes 64-bit chips for desktopswow!!!Itanium, Intel's line of 64-bit chips for server computers that can cost upward of $50,000 each....]with such a cash cow, no wonder Intel won't produce a cheap 64 bit proc. soon!why so late?last year we saw the AMD64 & the G5 64bit processors hit the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2004 05:59:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server+market.html"><![CDATA[server market]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[AMD expands 64-bit chip line]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1071&messageID=20752&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD expands 64-bit chip lineare these guys paid by Intel?'Slim Margins' ... p4e beats the athlon fx?!nary even a mention of the fact that these 64 bit chips are running in 32 bit mode and will juice up when software comes out of beta..It's sad to see journalism so tainted...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 15:50:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+4.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium 4]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[New Power Mac boasts 64-bit processor]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://news.zdnet.com/2036-2_22-740856.html]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[New Power Mac boasts 64-bit processorZDNet's Patrick Houston checks out the Gyration optical mouse, which uses radio frequency transmission to work without wires or a mouse pad.si]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Videos]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:34:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mice.html"><![CDATA[Mice]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+power+mac.html"><![CDATA[New Power Mac]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+power.html"><![CDATA[New Power]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit+cpu.html"><![CDATA[64-bit CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
