<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[32/64-bit chip Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/32%2f64-bit+chip.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to 32/64-bit chip]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel leads 32/64-bit chip sales, CEO says]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=8586&messageID=172721&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel leads 32/64-bit chip sales, CEO saysa bit misleadingfrom what i understand, though i may be wrong, intel is only leading in 32/64 server chip sales, which means they are aonly comparing their 32/64 Xeon (the only 32/64 chip they have) to AMDs Opteron, completely leaving out all of AMDs...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:32:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sales+strategy.html"><![CDATA[Sales strategy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sales+force+management.html"><![CDATA[Sales force management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sales.html"><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+xeon.html"><![CDATA[Intel Xeon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/32%252f64-bit+chip.html"><![CDATA[32/64-bit chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel unveils its 32/64-bit chips]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=4008&messageID=82502&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel unveils its 32/64-bit chipslimited quantities onlyIn other words, you don't have a prayer of finding one for the rest of the year.  This is becoming an all too familiar mantra to initial Intel releases of new architectures.why no mention of Athlon64?they keep comaring it to only Opterons, and...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/32%252f64-bit+chip.html"><![CDATA[32/64-bit chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+opteron.html"><![CDATA[AMD Opteron]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+athlon+64.html"><![CDATA[AMD Athlon 64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+athlon.html"><![CDATA[AMD Athlon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[For Intel, 32/64-bit chips a long time coming]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1785&messageID=37237&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[For Intel, 32/64-bit chips a long time comingIntel is the technology leader in Chip designsINTEL is paving the way towards the future of 32/64 bit computing.X86 will never scale like ItaniumYippee!  Consumers get to run X86 for another 30 years. OK, we can all get some rest from all...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/32%252f64-bit+chip.html"><![CDATA[32/64-bit chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+power5.html"><![CDATA[IBM POWER5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+x86.html"><![CDATA[Intel x86]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC,MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
